One World Religion, One World Government

“And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.” Revelation 17:1-2

The Book of Revelation tells us that during the 7 year tribulation, there will be a one-world government and a one-world religion.

The false prophet will use the one-world religion to promote the one-world government under the rule of the Anti-Christ. It will be a combination of all the world’s religions in one, promoting peace, harmony, and tolerance. Citizens of earth will be required to swear allegiance to this church to prove their loyalty.

Ironically, at mid point in the tribulation, the anti-Christ will abolish this one-world religion, declare himself to be God, and demand that all worship him and take his mark to prove their loyalty.Without the mark, one will not be able to buy or sell food or other goods. The mark will be on the wrist or the forehead. The technology for this is already in place.

The pieces of the puzzle continue to fall into place. There are already groups in existence that are promoting a one-world religion and one-world mindset. Watch this video from Charter for Compassion. If you go to their website, be sure to look at the symbolism at the very bottom of the page.






The video can also be seen here.

Also take a look at these:

Tanenbaum – Moving Beyond Differences (notice the not-so-subtle implication that ALL religion, including Christianity, promotes hate.

Alliance of Civilizations

It's amazing to see prophesied events falling into place.

Bush and Mexican Murderer vs US Supremes

Whose court is it anyway?

Bush and Mexican murderer vs US Supreme Court.

In 1993 in Houston Texas, a Mexican citizen by the name of Ernesto Medellin was arrested and convicted for the rape and murder of two teenaged girls – Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. Ernesto could speak and write in English. During his arrest, he was given the Miranda rights and he ended up giving the authorities a written confession. He was sentenced to death in 1994 and has been on death row ever since.

In International court, of which the United States has agreed to abide by, said that Ernesto’s rights were violated. It seems that a 1964 “Vienna Convention” ruling says that when people are arrested in another country, they should have access to their home country’s consular officials. The International Court of Justice (as it is called) said that Ernesto and 50 other Mexicans on death row in the United States should be allowed new court hearings to determine whether their violated rights affected the outcomes of their court decisions. Bush came out in support of the Mexican and the World Court.

The US Supreme Court ruled against Bush and Ernesto and other Mexicans on death row and said that neither Texas nor any other state had to abide by the World Court. The outcome of Ernesto’s trial would not have been affected either way.

The word “sovereignty” comes to mind.

The Mexican government stirred this whole thing up in the first place according to the article. Mexico has no death penalty.

It is unclear from the articles I’ve read whether Ernesto and his parents are here in the US legally or not. Regardless, he is considered a citizen of Mexico.

If Mexico doesn’t wants its citizens to face the death penalty for capital crimes then Mexico should keep its citizens home and quit encouraging them to cross the border.

If Mexicans disagree with the death penalty, then they shouldn’t murder and rape on US soil. When in Rome…